Wednesday, 21 October 2020

Constructive Equality

 

Many people in the world speak about equality nowadays. Groups of activists are busy organising protests and hunger strikes to bring about equality. There have been radical changes all over the world in past couple of centuries. Are they all healthy changes? It does not seem to be. The world does not seem to be more happy or peaceful than before. In my view, our march towards equality lacks clarity in vision. Hence there is a need to introspect and correct our orientation.

Equality can be either constructive or destructive. The Hindu scripture speak of a constructive equality – samatva. One can accomplish equality by destroying all that is rich and great. It is destructive. It is equality without quality.

There are people who speak against caste system in India. Caste system according to them encourages inequality. Hence the advocate removal of caste system. There are four varnas and each varna has its own subcommunities. Each group has its own unique cultural refinements, skills and abilities. The diversity among these communities has been enriching to the social and economic life of our country. If one is good at business, another is good at agriculture and so on. If we try to dismantle the uniqueness of these groups, we will definitely bring out equality. Yet, it is at the cost of all enriching features of each group.

Hence, what we need is to keep the uniqueness of each group intact and uplift each group in such a way that it improves their lives. Let a Brahmana maintain his unique spiritual and cultural practices. In the meantime, let his cultural refinement and scholarship help the other varnas as well. A brahmana is more culturally and spiritually refined than a Shudra. Equality, in spiritual realm cannot be brought about if a Brahmana becomes a shudra. A shudra should try to absorb the spiritual and cultural refinement of a brahmana. It is constructive. A Brahmana giving up his own spiritual observances and study of shastra to be at par with his shudra friend is nothing other than degradation.

Likewise, a Shudra has his own uniqueness. He does many works that a brahmana cannot do. He has his own dharma. If he tries to give up his skills and refinements and tries to be like someone else, he is leading himself and the society towards degradation, because the unique role that he played to enrich the society is lost for good. Hence a shudra should remain a shudra, contribute his part of duty to the society. Meanwhile he should continue to uplift himself culturally, spieitually and economically.

Varna vyavastha is not feudalism. Feudalism in medieval Europe was a social hierarchy. Being a linear power structure, it facilitated the exploitation and oppression of the lowly. A Eurocentric and superficial interpretation of varnas has led to the misconception that varna vyavastha is like feudalism in nature. Varna-vyavastha is not a power structure. Also, it is not linear. Many people think Brahmanas were most powerful and rich in Indian society. It is not true. Kshatriyas were the rulers. It was the duty of Kshatriyas to protect the people and punish the guilty. Vaishyas were generally the richest, as they were mostly merchants. Brahmanas were generally poor and led a simple life devoted to study and spiritual practices. Yet, Brahmanas were most respected because of their learning and simple lifestyle. It is the scholar and teacher who commands highest respect in our culture and not the powerful or rich.


Saturday, 17 October 2020

My Insight into Kanya-dana

 

This write-up is in response to a request. Mother of a girl wrote to me: “My daughter says she is not an object that can be given. She is reluctant to go through the ritual of Kanya-dana. Hence, I request you to explain your insight into Kanya-dana.”

Unfortunately, many present day Hindus are ignorant of their own rich cultural and spiritual heritage. Many do not understand the significance of practices of our tradition. Moreover, there are forces that misinterpret our tradition to serve their own ulterior motives. Many youngsters fall prey to such interpretations and criticise our own practices.

It is not easy to understand the subtle and profound practices and symbolisms of Hindus if we look at them from a Eurocentric perspective. There is a great degree of asymmetry between our traditions and the western culture. The modern people fail to understand the Hindus because they try to calibrate everything using western yardstick. Therefore, I request the youngsters to keep their westernised perspective away and try to look at Hindu practices from a different perspective.

The Hindu scriptures accord a highly adorable position to women. “Where women are honoured, there revel the devatas” – thus says the great sage Manu. It is a King’s duty to protect the financial interests and independence of a single woman like a widow. (Ref. Manu-smriti 8.28)

This also falsifies the claim of the westerners that Sati system used to be a Hindu practice. If a woman is supposed to be burnt, how can her financial interest be safeguarded! Also, there is not a single mention of Sati system in the scriptures!

The Rishis of the past also understood that women need special protection, as they do not have the same physical strength as men. Hence, it is the duty of her father, husband, and son to protect her during her childhood, youth, and old age respectively. A woman is not encouraged to stay on her own, as she needs support and protection. (Manu 9.3) The word used in Manusmrti is svatantrya. If we analyse the context, it means to be on one’s own without anyone to protect, as she needs support and protection. The modern intellectuals misinterpret such words. Then Manu sounds ridiculous. The word used against it is rakshati – ­which means protection. Hence swatantrya means living with no protection. Both father and husband are responsible to facilitate education of the woman, duly ensuring her protection.

With this background, let us try to understand the concept of Kanya-dana. The word is made of two words – kanya and dana. According to Mahabharata, kanya is a woman who is free to choose her husband. A woman is free to choose her husband, as long as she does not transgress the values of Dharma.  (Refer Mahabharata Vanaparva 307.13) Therefore, kanya is not an object to be given. An object does not have the freedom to choose with who it must stay. A kanya is a human being and she has freedom to choose. There are several instances of Svayam-vara in our ancient texts that bear testimony to a woman’s freedom in our tradition. However, it is her parents' duty to facilitate and guide her while choosing a life partner. It is always good to seek counsel from elders while making crucial decisions in life. 

"Wife is one's friend made by the divine", say Mahabharata (Vanaparva 313.72). One does not receive a friend as a gift or donation. Also, a friend is not treated as an object in possession.

Then what does dana mean? Generally, it is used in the sense of giving. The meaning does not hold good here. Dana is derived from the root ‘daa’. A root can have several meanings in sanskrit. A word changes its meaning with context. It is true in every language. In this context, it can be understood as the process of handing over the duty of protection.

This meaning will become evident if we take a closer look into the ritual of Kanya-dana. It is just a part of wedding ceremony – vivaha. It is not the whole ceremony. There are many other rituals associated with vivaha.

During the ritual of kanya-dana, the bride’s father asks the bridegroom to protect the interests of the bride and be a responsible husband. Then the bridegroom in return makes a promise to both bride and her father that he will not transgress the duties of a husband. He also promises that he will not leave her and will not go against her wishes. This is the gist of the mantras that are chanted during the process of Kanya-dana.

In some civilizations, women were sold for a price. Our dharma-shastras plainly condemn such acts. A woman cannot be sold. Nor can she be given as an object. Hence, we do not find woman listed among things that can be given as dana! The formalities and rituals associated with offering things to deserving ones is very much distinct from that of kanya-dana.

Kanya-dana is a beautiful concept unique to our tradition. The Hindus neither sold their women nor asked them to fend for themselves. Women were protected and adored. Sanatana Dharma is all for respect and protection to women.   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thursday, 15 October 2020

Vivekachudamani 118 to 121

 14th October 2020.                                                                                                                                   

 

                                                                                            VIVEKACHUDAMANI

Talks by Swami Shivaprakashananda Saraswati.

 

 

 

सर्ववेदान्तसिद्धान्तगोचरं तमगोचरम् 
गोविन्दं परमानन्दं सद्गुरुं प्रणतोऽस्म्यहम्   

sarvavedāntasiddhāntagocaraṃ tamagocaram |
govindaṃ paramānandaṃ sadguruṃ praṇato'smyaham || 1 ||

 

Shloka 118

मिश्रस्य सत्त्वस्य भवन्ति धर्माः
त्वमानिताद्या नियमा यमाद्याः 
श्रद्धा  भक्तिश्च मुमुक्षता 
दैवी  सम्पत्तिरसन्निवृत्तिः  ११८ 

miśrasya sattvasya bhavanti dharmāḥ
tvamānitādyā niyamā yamādyāḥ |
ś
raddhā ca bhaktiśca mumukṣatā ca
daivī ca sampattirasannivṛttiḥ || 118 ||

Sattva can be classified into two types Vishudhha Satva and Mishrit Sattva.

Vishuddha Sattva means pure Sattva that is not contaminated by Rajas and Tamas.

Mishrit Satvva is the Sattva that is contaminated by Rajas and Tamas.

Mishrit Sattva can be further classified into two-

Durbala Sattva and Prabala Sattva.

When Sattva is weak, Rajas and Tamas are stronger, then it is Durbala Sattva and when a person has Durbala Sattva he will remain as a total ‘Samsaari,’ not even interested in Moksha. In due course of time because of special Punyas he may become Prabala Sattva, and the Sattva becomes stronger and Rajas and Tamas become weak!

A Sattva predominant person! Then, he gets all the qualities that are conducive for the pursuit of Moksha. He becomes a Mumukshu, he seeks Moksha and he gets all the qualities that are prescribed for a Mumukshu like Shraddha ,Bhakti etc.

This Shloka is talking about ‘Prabala Sattva’.

Durbala Sattva has been told in Shloka 117. That is Durbala Sattva. When Sattva is with Rajas and Tamas and overpowered by Rajas and Tamas that Sattva does not become favourable to Moksha but when the same Sattva becomes Prabala even though there is some influence of Rajas and Tamas, the Sattva facilitates Moksha.

 मिश्रस्य सत्त्वस्य  धर्माः
miśrasya sattvasya dharmāḥ


The qualities of Mishrit Sattva we have to understand as ‘Prabala Mishrit Sattva’.

It is still Mishrit Sattva and yet it is Prabala! It is still mixed up with Rajas and Tamas and yet Sattva is stronger!

 धर्माः dharmah—the qualities of Mishrit Sattva—the qualities of Prabala Sattva . What are they?

अमानित्वमदम्भित्व

amānitvam adambhitvam

 This refers to twenty qualities enumerated in Chapter 13 of Bhagwad Geeta.

Ch 13 Shola 7 onwards there is a list of 20 qualities.

 

 

अमानित्वमदम्भित्वमहिंसा क्षान्तिरार्जवम् |
आचार्योपासनं शौचं स्थैर्यमात्मविनिग्रह: || 8||

amānitvam adambhitvam ahinsā khāntir ārjavam
āchāryopāsana
 śhaucha sthairyam ātma-vinigraha

Those qualities are desirable for the pursuit of Jnanam.

‘amanitvam’ means humility, ‘adambhitvam’ etc. One can look into Bhagwad Geeta for the details.

Niyama yamadyah -नियमा यमाद्याः 
Niyama and Yama. Yoga Shastra prescribes five disciplines are known as Yama and they are-

 Ahimsa --Non-violence.

Satya—Truthfulness.

Asteya--Not stealing and not deceiving.

Brahmacharya--and

Aparigraha--Not accepting unnecessary possessions. If one takes up too many possessions which are not needed to conduct a normal life it can cause a headache, a distraction, and therefore for a Mumuksha ‘aparigraha’ is valid. Then there are five Niyamas.

Shaucha --Cleanliness,

Santosh—Contentment, remaining satisfied with whatever one has and not complaining about what one is lacking.

Tapah—Austerities.

Swadhyah—Study of Moksha Shastra which reveals the means for Moksha.

Ishwara Pranidhana -Offering everything to Ishwara. Whatever action one does one offers it to Ishwara and accepts the result as the grace of Ishwara. In other words—surrender to Ishwara. Taking refuge at Ishwara is called Ishwara Pranidhana.

These are five Yamas and five Niyamas. They are defined and explained in Patanjali’s Yoga Sutras as two parts of Ashtanga Yoga.

Shraddha-a trust in the words of the Shastras as explained by the Guru.

Bhakti-devotion to Ishwara as well as devotion to the Guru.

Mumushttva—an intense desire for Moksha. This is listed in Chapter 16 of the Bhagwad Geeta, दैवी सम्पद्विमोक्षाय निबन्धायासुरी मता |

The first three Shlokas of Chapter 16 which we are studying now on Sunday classes. ‘Abhayam Sattva SanShuddhir’.

श्रीभगवानुवाच |
अभयं सत्त्वसंशुद्धिर्ज्ञानयोगव्यवस्थिति: |
दानं दमश्च यज्ञश्च स्वाध्यायस्तप आर्जवम् || 1||
अहिंसा सत्यमक्रोधस्त्याग: शान्तिरपैशुनम् |
दया भूतेष्वलोलुप्त्वं मार्दवं ह्रीरचापलम् || 2||
तेज: क्षमा धृति: शौचमद्रोहोनातिमानिता |
भवन्ति सम्पदं दैवीमभिजातस्य भारत || 3||

śhrī-bhagavān uvācha
abhaya
 sattva-sanśhuddhir jñāna-yoga-vyavasthiti
d
āna damaśh cha yajñaśh cha svādhyāyas tapa ārjavam
ahins
ā satyam akrodhas tyāga śhāntir apaiśhunam
day
ā bhūtehv aloluptva mārdava hrīr achāpalam
teja
 khamā dhiti śhaucham adroho nāti-mānitā
bhavanti sampada
 daivīm abhijātasya bhārata

 

I think there are twenty-six qualities mentioned for ‘Daivi Sampada’. For details please refer to our Sunday morning classes.

Restraining from Adharma अधर्म , restrain from all that is prohibited by the Shastras. The Shastras prohibit certain activities like violence, telling lies, alcohol etc. Restrain from them is ‘Asanga Nivritti,’. When Sattva becomes predominant a person understands the importance of all the noble values that are prescribed in the Shastras and then he works towards it to improve upon those values and qualities. Then, in due course of time, he becomes a Jnani. He gets Atma Jnana.

The Atma Jnana makes a person free from the effects of Rajas and Tamas and they are the ones that cause Samsaara.

When a person has Atma Jnana the Rajas and the Tamas lose the ability to cause Samsaara.

Therefore, the Acharya refers to  Atma Jnani as free from Rajas and Tamas. Tamas has Avaarna Shakti and it can cause ignorance and delusion. Atma Jnani does not have ignorance and delusion. Rajas has Vikshepa Shakti and it causes desires etc. The Vikshepa Shakti can work only when there is Avarana Shakti and for a Jnani the Avarana Shakti is already removed, then Vikshepa Shakti has no scope of working. Therefore, a Jnani is free from the clutches of Vikshepa Shakti and Avarna Shakti which means that a Jnani is free from the effects of Rajas and Tamas and that is why the Jnani’s mind can be understood as ‘Vishuddha Sattva’ and this Sattva is free from Rajas and Tamas.

In the next Shloka the author discusses ‘Vishuddha Sattva’.

Shloka 119.

विशुद्धसत्त्वस्य गुणाः प्रसादः
स्वात्मानुभूतिः परमा प्रशान्तिः 
तृप्तिः प्रहर्षः परमात्मनिष्ठा
यया सदानन्दरसं समृच्छति  ११९ 

viśuddhasattvasya guṇāḥ prasādaḥ
svātmānubhūtiḥ paramā praśāntiḥ |
tṛptiḥ praharṣaḥ paramātmaniṣṭhā
yayā sadānandarasaṃ sadānandarasaṃ samṛcchati || 119 |

 

विशुद्धसत्त्व—viśuddhasattva.

The characteristics of Vishuddha Sattva—प्रसादः ‘Prasadah’, clarity. The mind is free from the effects of Rajas and Tamas, free from ignorance and free from confusion.

स्वात्मानुभूतिः --svātmānubhūtiḥ . A clear understanding of one’s Atma---One’s  Self.

परमा प्रशान्तिः -- paramā praśāntiḥ. Supreme peace! Ajnani’s peace is relative. If  Ajnani has to be peaceful, the circumstances around him have to allow him to be peaceful as his peace is dependent on external factors. If nobody is causing problems, he is peaceful. If something goes wrong outside, he cannot remain peaceful. This is not so with a JNANI.

A Jnani’s peace is independent of the ambience and irrespective of all the troubles in life and irrespective of the problems in life, a Jnani remains peaceful within himself. That kind of peace is –परमाप्रशान्तिः -- paramā praśāntiḥ- Supreme peace and not relative peace!

It is not relative peace which is  ‘Apakeshi Shanti’. Generally, people experience this kind of  ‘Apakeshi Shanti’ --relative and temporary peace.

Atma Jnana leads to absolute peace. Supreme peace!

परमात्मनिष्ठा -- A Jnani gets stationed in Paramatma. Generally, people are stationed in the body because we identify with the body, which means our ‘I’ is situated in the body.   That means our identification of ‘I’ is located in the body and unfortunately, it is the wrong place for the ‘I’ --for the identification of ‘I’.

The ‘I’ has to be placed in the correct position-- in what deserves to be referred to as ‘I’ --- that is Paramatma. A Jnani’s ‘I’ has shifted from the body to Paramatma.

Therefore, one can say that a Jnani is stationed in Paramatma. That is Paramatma Nishtha परमात्मा निष्ठा in spite of working through the body and in spite of transacting through the body, a Jnani is stationed in Paramatma because he does not lose sight of his true identity as Paramatma.

 When there is Paramatma Nishta परमात्मा निष्ठा the Jnani has discovered the true source of happiness, the perennial source of inner happiness which is nothing but Paramatma.
यया -yaya

Let us see the last quarter.


यया सदानन्दरसं समृच्छति  ११९ 

Yaya parmatma nishtha
sadānandarasaṃ

Paramtma Nishta परमात्मनिष्ठा —Sadanand -सदानन्द

A Jnani gets ‘SADANAND’ always ‘ANANDA’—perennial Anand!

In fact, a Jnani is standing on the perennial source of ANANDA, therefore he does not have to seek Ananda or import Ananda from outside. As a result of, discovering Sadananda two things happen when this Ananda is there.

Let us see the third quarter of the verse-

praharṣaḥ - प्रहर्षः

triptih-तृप्तिः

praharṣaḥ - प्रहर्षः is different from ‘Harsha’ हर्ष
You are happy when there is an external object --Vishaya Sukha. विषय सुख as long as the object allows me to be happy, I am happy. When the object goes away the Harsha- -हर्ष also goes away!

Then Vishad विषाद

Harsha-हर्ष and Vishad विषाद these are two opposites, two waves.

A ‘Ajnani’ अज्ञानी   has Harsha and Vishaada –fluctuates between Harsha and Vishaada.

ज्ञानी-JNANI has Praharsha -प्रहर्ष_-- He is free from Harsha.

What is ‘Praharsha’? He is happy even in the absence of external objects. Being happy in the absence of external objects is ‘Praharsha’ -प्रहर्ष

Then there is triptih तृप्ति: and there is ‘Praharsha’ there is triptih तृप्तिः –satisfaction You don’t feel the need for anything additional because you have enough. Only when I have something lacking, I seek something more.

 तृप्तिः ‘triptih’ is the ability to say ‘no’ to something more.

 “I don’t need”- is because I have enough. This feeling is triptih-- which is ‘Alam-Buddhi’ अलंबुद्धि.  I don’t need more. It is enough! This feeling is ‘Alam Buddhi’.  These are the characteristics of ‘Vishuddha Sattva’.

They are experienced by a Jnani. Our objective is to transform from Durbala Sattva दुर्बल सत्त्व--that is the journey of a Mumukshu--A spiritual seeker.

 

Shloka 120

अव्यक्तमेतत्त्रिगुणैर्निरुक्तं
तत्कारणं नाम शरीरमात्मनः 
सुषुप्तिरेतस्य विभक्त्यवस्था
प्रलीनसर्वेन्द्रियबुद्धिवृत्तिः  १२

avyaktametattriguṇairniruktaṃ
tatkāraṇaṃ nāma śarīramātmanaḥ |
suṣuptiretasya vibhaktyavasthā
pralīnasarvendriyabuddhivṛttiḥ || 120 ||

 

The author discussed three Gunas, Rajas, Tamas and Sattva. The three Gunas are the constituents of MAYA.

The author is discussing Maya because Maya is the Karana Shareer- कारण शरीर

Our main topic is Atma and Anatma Viveka. We are discriminating between Atma and Anatma and to distinguish between the two the author is discussing the Anatma the ‘Non-Self’ and while discussing the Anatma –‘Non-Self’ he discussed sthoola and sukshma-shareer स्थूल शरीर और कारण शरीर and now he is discussing कारण शरीर Karana Shareer.

He introduced Maya and while describing Maya he said Maya has three Gunas and then he discussed the three Gunas.

Now he is concluding the discussion of Karana Shareer- कारण शरीर in this and the following Shlokas.

अव्यक्तमेतत्त्रिगुणैर्निरुक्तं
avyaktametattriguṇairniruktaṃ

This Maya is अव्यक्त ‘Avyakta’. It is not manifest. Maya is Shakti. Ishwar’s Shakti. It is the potential of Ishwar. The potential is not manifest. It is true with any potential. For, example my ability to speak. The ability is not ‘manifest’. You can see the effect of the potential when I speak! Likewise, Maya is always अव्यक्त AVYAKTA ‘unmanifest’. We cannot see Maya but we can see the effect of Maya.

The whole Universe is the effect of Maya!

त्रिगुणात्मिका माया--trigunatmika Maya consists of three. It is described as a component of three Gunas.

तत्कारणं नाम शरीरमात्मनः 

tatkāraṇaṃ nāma śarīramātmanaḥ |
Tatta Atmanam Karan Shareer

It is a Shareer ! Even Maya is a Shareer and it is कारण शरीर Karaana Shareer -- Causal body, because it is the ‘cause’ of the other two Shareeras.

Maya-- Karaana Shareer is there always whether we are waking or whether we are dreaming or whether we are in deep sleep. There is Maya, there is Karaana Shareer.  But when we are in waking or in dream - state we cannot experience कारण शरीर Karana Shareer distinctly because in Jagrat Avasatha, in waking, our Sthoola Shareer is very much active and so is our Sukshma Shareer.

Therefore, in waking, there are all three Shareeras—Sukshma Shareer, Sthoola Shareer as well as Karana Shareer. Then we cannot distinguish Karana Shareer from the other two Shareeras as all are there together.
Likewise, in dream, in Svapana Avastha 
स्वप्न अवस्था there is no Sthoola Shareer. We do not experience our Sthoola Shareer BUT Sukshma Shareer is active.

Therefore, there is Sukshma Shareer as well as Karana Shareer in dream, therefore in  Sukshama Shareer also we cannot experience Karana Shareer distinctly. Then, where can we experience Karana Shareer distinctly?

We have to go to deep sleep! In deep sleep, both Sukshma Shareer and Sthoola Shareer are absent.

You do not experience either Sukshma Shareer or Sthoola Shareer and that state is called ‘deep sleep’. Karana Shareer alone is experienced in the absence of Sthoola Shareer and Sukshma Shareer. That is why the author says that in deep sleep we experience the Karana Shareer distinctly, independent of the other two bodies.

 

प्रलीनसर्वेन्द्रियबुद्धिवृत्तिः  १२

avyaktametattriguṇairniruktaṃ
tatkāraṇaṃ nāma śarīramātmanaḥ |
suṣuptiretasya vibhaktyavasthā
pralīnasarvendriyabuddhivṛttiḥ || 120 ||

 

 

Therefore—प्रलीनसर्वेन्द्रियबुद्धिवृत्तिः--pralīnasarvendriyabuddhivṛttiḥ --is Sushupti सुषुप्ति.

The author describes and defines ‘Sushupti’. What is ‘Sushupti’?

When all the functioning of the senses as well of the mind resolve, then you get ‘Sushupti’ सुषुप्ति.

The ‘Indriya Vrittis’ -- the functions of the senses are resolved. The senses are not functioning and even the mind –buddhi, is also not functioning. Both senses and mind go to rest and that state is called ‘Sushupti’ - सुषुप्ति

 प्रलीनसर्वेन्द्रियबुद्धिवृत्तिः
pralīnasarvendriyabuddhivṛttiḥ -- 
is ‘Sushupti’ सुषुप्ति.

It is an explanation of ‘Sushupti’. It is the exclusive state of Karana  Shareer, the state in which one can distinctly experience  Karana Shareer. All forms of cognition resolve.

 

Let us go to the next verse.

Shloka 121.

सर्वप्रकारप्रमितिप्रशान्तिः
बीजात्मनावस्थितिरेव बुद्धेः 
सुषुप्तिरेतस्य किल प्रतीतिः
किंचिन्न वेद्मीति जगत्प्रसिद्धेः  १२१ 

sarvaprakārapramitipraśāntiḥ
bījātmanāvasthitireva buddheḥ |
suṣuptiretasya kila pratītiḥ
kiṃcinna vedmīti jagatprasiddheḥ || 121 ||

 


बीजात्मनावस्थितिरेव बुद्धेः।
bījātmanāvasthitireva buddheḥ

The author explains ‘Sushupti’ further. All forms of cognitions resolve. Neither we see the external objects nor we experience the objects that are registered in our mind. All cognitions stop!

सर्वप्रकारप्रमितिप्रशान्तिः--sarvaprakārapramitipraśāntiḥ

In ‘Sushupti’ our mind also does not work because it has resolved into its causal form. It is like our computer going to sleep mode. What happens  when the computer goes in sleep mode? The programs resolve. The programs are not working. It is potentially there, but not functioning. Likewise, when go to deep sleep the Buddhi is potentially there but it is not working! That means that it has resolved into its causal state.


बीजात्मनावस्थितिरेव बुद्धेः। bījātmanāvasthitireva buddheḥ
Buddhi remains in its causal, its potential form so that after a while it can manifest once again. It is not manifest now and now it is potentially there but when we wake up the Buddhi manifests once again.

This is ‘Sushupti’- सुषुप्ति

In ‘Sushupti’ we experience Karana Shareer. In ‘Sushupti’, Karana Shareer is evident.
How do you know that Karana Shareer is evident in Sushupti? We know because everyone in the world, when they wake up, they all without an exception, they all say, “I was sleeping, I did not know anything, during sleep, I did not KNOW anything”.

This experience is universal! I did not know anything --means I experienced – ‘Ignorance’. There is an experience of Ignorance in deep sleep and Ignorance is Karana Shareer and therefore, Karana Shareer is experienced in Sushupti- सुषुप्ति


किंचिन्न वेद्मीति जगत्प्रसिद्धेः
kiṃcinna vedmīti jagatprasiddheḥ

I did not know anything! This is Jagat Prasiddha जगत प्रसिद्धः

 It is experienced by everyone in the world!